We're all familiar with a certain Time Lord and her preferred mode of telephonic transport:
But while the Doctor was one of the first, she is far from unique - in fact there's a long and respectable tradition of science fiction heroes travelling in telephone booths. Excluding the good Doctor, here are my top five long distance callers:
#1 Bill And Ted
Doctor Who has spawned many spin-off series and movies over the years. My favourites were the Bill and Ted movies - Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure (1989) and Bogus Journey (1991). It's a blast - a great time-travel comedy and a decent attempt to create an American Doctor Who. It's absolutely canon. The eponymous heroes, played by Alex Winter and Keanu someone or other, travel through time in a US phone booth "borrowed" from Time Lord Rufus (who strictly speaking should be called The Rufus), encountering historical celebrities in their quest to complete their homework and ultimately secure the future of civilization through music. A nice touch is that this TARDIS is actually controlled by looking up the desired historical period in a phone book and dialling the number.
#2 Harry Potter
Why waste time with flying cars, boring broomsticks, itchy Floo powder or those blasted Portkeys when you can travel in style in a phone booth? The phone booths in Harry Potter are secret entrances to the Ministry of Magic.
#3 Professor Branestawm
In the BBC's fun adaptation of Norman Hunter's Professor Branestawm, starring Harry Hill, the Professor invents a slightly slower-moving phone.
#4 Neo
The Matrix is another of my favourite Doctor Who spin-offs. The links to original Who are subtle, but Whovian fans should be well aware that in Doctor Who, the Time Lords have a supercomputer called the Matrix. In the Matrix, there is also a supercomputer called The Matrix. If you are exploring the Matrix and need to leave in a hurry, you get to a phone booth.
#5 Superman
The final entry in this list is Superman. He only rates #5 as he doesn't actually travel in a phone booth, he just changes in one. This will be hard to explain to the mobile phone generation.
Wednesday, 21 March 2018
Thursday, 15 March 2018
Fifty Angry Men [Review: Circle]
Fifty people awake to find they are standing on glowing red
spots in a circle in a dark room. They quickly learn that they are playing a
deadly game – every few minutes one person is killed instantly by a shock from
the hemisphere in the centre, their body then dragged out into the darkness by
unseen forces. If they step off their circles they also die. It takes them a
few rounds, and a few deaths, to understand that while they cannot prevent the
scheduled rounds, they can choose who dies in each round.
Circle is a literal, minimalist version of the balloon
debate – if the balloon is losing altitude and you can’t all survive, who gets chucked out of the balloon and how
do you persuade others to do the chucking. The starting fifty are diverse
enough to (loosely) represent all of humanity. As the players learn how to vote
for each other, alliances and dividing lines appear around age, race, gender,
sexuality, politics and profession. Players try to use this to their advantage,
but if they seem too manipulative then other players may turn on them next.
This is a low-budget, one-room, concept movie – The Hunger
Games meets Exam meets Cube (links are to my reviews of these films) with a dash of Lord of the Flies and a twist of Twelve Angry Men. While the
scenario is contrived, even compared to other one-room movies, the writers and directors, Aaron Hann and Mario Miscione, have hit on a simple but effective concept which builds
tension over and over again, and the script stands up well covering a lot of ground.
The main expense for this film was probably the cast of fifty actors - all unknown but certainly up to the job, so the conflict is believable. There's a lot of death, it's sudden and brutal although not too bloody, and while some deaths are shown directly many are communicated through reaction shots. The ending isn't easily predictable, and left me with a lot to think about. The film could be a metaphor for political extremism, media bias or the rise of prejudice in general, and of course it's even more relevant in the age of Reality TV.
The main expense for this film was probably the cast of fifty actors - all unknown but certainly up to the job, so the conflict is believable. There's a lot of death, it's sudden and brutal although not too bloody, and while some deaths are shown directly many are communicated through reaction shots. The ending isn't easily predictable, and left me with a lot to think about. The film could be a metaphor for political extremism, media bias or the rise of prejudice in general, and of course it's even more relevant in the age of Reality TV.
Two important questions are left unanswered: when does the board game
version come out, and how many batteries will it require?
To disambiguate, this is low-budget movie Circle (2015) – not the
movie of Dave Eggers’ internet parody novel The Circle (2017).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)